Loadingā¦
5
I finally stopped over-editing my Milky Way shots after a comment at a star party
About two summers back, I was showing off a photo I took from a dark sky site near Flagstaff. I was really proud of it, you know, because I'd spent like an hour in editing software pushing the colors and contrast. This older guy, a regular at these events, took a look and just said, 'Looks like a neon sign. Where are the stars?' It hit me hard. He was right. I was so focused on making it 'pop' that I was turning real star fields into cartoon versions. Now, my main rule is to pull back the saturation slider by at least 30% from my first instinct. I try to keep the core of the Milky Way looking dusty and natural, not purple and pink. It's less flashy, but it feels more true to what I actually saw standing out there in the cold. Anyone else get called out for going too far with the edits?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
eric_carr7mo ago
Pull back on clarity sliders too, not just color. Over-sharpening creates that harsh, digital look that fights the natural soft glow of the night sky. Finding the balance between detail and realism is the real trick.
3
karen4057mo ago
Yeah, and it's so easy to go too far with texture and dehaze sliders for the same reason. Like what @eric_carr said about clarity, those tools can really kill the depth and mood if you crank them up trying to pull out every last star. You end up with a flat, noisy mess instead of that feeling of looking into deep space. The best night shots keep some mystery and don't try to show everything.
3
anderson.spencer4mo ago
Woah, flat and noisy? That's wild. I always figured more detail meant a better shot, but you're saying it can actually wreck the whole feel of it.
4