Loadingā¦
7
Showerthought: My team's 3D scan of a Roman floor mosaic in Pompeii showed way more pigment than we expected.
Some think the colors were preserved by the ash fall, but others argue our laser just picked up mineral traces. Which theory sounds more likely to you?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
parker_hunt615mo ago
Oh man, the mineral trace thing seems way more likely to me. Our gear picks up all kinds of weird ghost readings from stuff like that.
5
andrew74mo ago
Yeah, that ghost reading thing can really mess with your head... been there. What helped me was running a second pass with the scanner settings dialed way down, focusing just on that one area. It usually shows if it's a real surface feature or just sensor noise. Sometimes you gotta treat the data, not just trust the first pretty picture it gives you.
3
jade475mo ago
Actually, the mineral trace idea that parker_hunt61 mentioned is a common mix-up. Laser scanners measure geometry and reflectivity, not chemical makeup. What you're likely seeing is the actual surface difference where pigment survived. The ash sealed it from weather, so even faint color left a physical texture the laser can catch. It's not a ghost reading, just a very detailed map of what's really there.
2