Loadingā¦
20
Half-lit decay beats full-dark shots, am I wrong
I keep seeing everyone post these moody blacked-out shots of places like the old Franklin Park Mall in Toledo, and I get it, the grime looks cool. But I've been walking these ghost corridors for 8 years now, and I think we're all missing the point. With the lights still on but flickering, you can see the faded food court signs, the tile patterns, the weird bench shapes from 1987. You can notice the exact spot where the anchor store doors were removed, that stuff matters for the history. Full dark just turns everything into a silhouette, you lose the details that tell you what this place actually was. Why do you think the half-lit walkway next to the old escalator in the Raleigh Springs Mall hit different? So my question is, have you ever walked one with the power still on but dying, and did you pay more attention to the little stuff? Or are we all just chasing the dramatic darkness for the photo likes?
1 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In1 Comment
faith_perez17d ago
There was a whole thread on some urbex forum years back about the old mall in my area where a guy mapped out the tile colors wing by wing using shots taken while the backup lights were still running. That kind of stuff is permanent history you can't get back once the power gets cut. Full dark photos all start looking the same after a while, just another dark hallway. The half-lit shots actually tell you WHERE you are and what year the place came from.
3