Loadingā¦
21
Just realized the city's plan to replace our street's oak trees is dividing plant lovers
I saw yellow tags on the big oak trees on my block a few days ago. Found out the city wants to remove them and plant smaller trees that use less water. A bunch of folks are mad, saying these oaks are part of our neighborhood's history and give cool shade in hot months. On the other side, people argue that with the dry spells we've had, it's smart to pick plants that save water. I walk my dog here every day and I'm stuck, I love the old trees but I also hate wasting water. It feels like choosing between keeping what we know and fixing a real problem. How do other botany fans deal with this kind of stuff? Curious to hear your take on saving old trees vs going for water-wise plants.
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
the_rowan7mo ago
We pushed our city to keep a few heritage pines and swap the rest for drought tolerant natives. It took a bunch of calls to council members, but they agreed to a mixed approach. The new stuff took a couple summers to fill in, but now we still have some old character while using way less water. It wasn't perfect, but it felt like a decent middle ground.
3
wesley_foster447mo ago
Sounds like you still wasted a lot of water on those pines.
2
the_wren7mo ago
Used to believe all old trees were worth keeping, but watching our street's elms struggle in a dry summer changed my view. Now I see why mixing in drought friendly plants can be a good move. What changed your mind on this stuff?
1